Photos 5 on Catalina is spending a lot of time with duplicate detection, but currently it is implemented in a somewhat disappointing way. Which version of macOS X and Photos are you currently using? When you share the same photo again, it will be added to the album again, because the version in the shared album is different from the photo you want to share again. When you share a photo to a smart album, Photos will create a downsized copy of the photo for the smart album, strip many metadata from the photo and rename it, then upload it to the smart album. Shared albums are shown in your Photos Library for convenience, but are not apart of the library. I'm sure secretly, in the apple backend, you are running a dedup so you only store these duplicates once, but are still able to charge twice - my thoughts anyways. The year is 2020, we are finally able to compare file-size, file-name, and even date/time a picture/video was taken, we also have the ability to compare an actual picture with another to find a % of potential match - why is a company so advanced such as apple not allowing the most simple features? is it because you can charge more for cloud storage when everyone is paying for duplicates? Question 2: Is there a way to detect/delete duplicates in the entire photo collection (yes i also have the tendency to download duplicate family photos from the internet, and now i have multiples) Side note: default sort is by date, but its not accurate, i still find 2 photos which are the exact same divided by 10 other photos in the middle. Questions 1: is there an easy way to detect/delete duplicate photos or videos in shared albums? or even list by filename or date so i can do it manually? “We will continue to tune Q as it transitions from being a product in preview to being generally available.I have many shared albums with my wife, where we add picture of our son - since i never know which the last picture i uploaded was (or if i missed any in the middle) i always select an overlap of photos when adding to the album, thinking apples software is smart enough to say "picture already exists, i'll skip this one" this does not appear to be the case. No security issue was identified as a result of that feedback,” the spokesperson said. “Some employees are sharing feedback through internal channels and ticketing systems, which is standard practice at Amazon. An Amazon spokesperson said Q has not leaked confidential information. But shortly after Q’s launch, Amazon employees internally reported concerns that the bot was leaking information that would “induce cardiac incidents in Legal,” Platformer reported. AWS has tried to position itself as the more secure, reliable and nuanced option in generative AI. It’s not consumer facing nor available to the public, though thousands of AWS customers including companies like Deloitte and Gilead Sciences can access it for $20 per user a month. Q is a workplace tool aimed at helping staff be more productive by assisting on tasks like fielding customer service calls and creating work documents based on company data. At its annual conference, re:Invent, held in Las Vegas this month, Amazon finally launched its answer to Microsoft Co-pilot and ChatGPT Enterprise with the release of Amazon Q. Amazon Web Services, the company’s massive cloud computing division, has increasingly been pushing back against that narrative. The e-commerce giant has been dealing all year with perceptions that it had fallen behind in the great AI race.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |